Freedom of dressing isn't equal to nudism

Every time we write on freedom of dressing, machas be like ‘ivingge avuthu pottu nadapangalam, naange paake kudatham.’ Mande full-a blue aa iruntha ippadi tha. Machas PC probably is like the PCs of ISIS - 80% filled with porn. That’s why they can’t figure out what freedom of dressing means. Their mind is filled with prurient filth - even a fully covered woman is not safe because these machas imagine what’s underneath and when the imagination gets out of hand, rape happens.When we write about women, especially Indian women being given freedom to dress as they prefer – it triggers moronic reactions from machas. Of course, half of it will be in the form of threats – siler peru patta than thirunthuvangge (some will regret when they face problems). And the number of machas who claim – ivangge avuthu pothu nadapangge, guys eh blame pennuvangge (they will walk naked and blame the guys). Like seriously? Everytime, we talk about freedom of dressing, machas quickly assume that what we want is to walk stark naked on the streets. You see, these are the porn watching idiots who think that freedom of dressing means no dress at all. All we are asking is for women to be left alone with their choice of dressings – jeans, blouse, halter tops, leggings etc. And you guys quickly think that we will just take off our clothes and start roaming naked? It shows how deprived you are and how you machas conveniently blame women for everything. Only retarded machas can take such a leap – from freedom of dressing to assuming that women will walk the streets, naked. And you will shamelessly defend guys who pounce on girls, who rub on girls or who rape girls – citing they didn’t cover themselves enough. We are seeing more and more machas with backward, longkang mentalities nowadays. These machas who say ‘don’t ask guys not to rape’ should be incarcerated in a dungeon and chained at the neck and never be let out in a civil world because siler per ulle thooki pottu senja kude tirunthamatange.